InAbsentia
New member
- Jul 31, 2008
- 1
- 0
- 1
When you use the things you start to accept crappy music quality and in general, you lose the concept of the album because you've only downloaded a few songs, or put them on your playlist. If an artist isn't good enough to put out an entire album of good music, they're not worth buying.
Aside from that, aesthetically, mp3s sound terrible. CDs are starting to be viewed as the secondary medium, only to be "ripped" to the computer. Computers aren't everything. I guarantee if I played a CD on a nice stereo and compared it to your crappy earbuds, you'd be blown away.
So, appreciate it when you are with music. You're degrading the music as well as your surroundings when you walk around with an ipod.
meggi poo, you are delusional. Read this: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17777619/the_death_of_high_fidelity/2
and this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3
and this
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/327319_mp3sound13.html
Deligeez, you as well are hilariously delusional. Do some reading and stop believing what your itunes software tells you.
CD is comparable to vinyl in sound quality. An mp3 is what's called a lossy file. It works by deleting information in the WAV file you're not likely to notice. So, even when a file is ripped at 320kbps it is still only 10% of the original file. Read the above links
Wow. Do some reading people.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f46/can-i-hear-difference-between-320kbps-lossless-341289/
the CD is the source. How can anything other than the source sound better, i.e. your claimed 320 is better than 192. No kidding. CD is about 1141kbps
Aside from that, aesthetically, mp3s sound terrible. CDs are starting to be viewed as the secondary medium, only to be "ripped" to the computer. Computers aren't everything. I guarantee if I played a CD on a nice stereo and compared it to your crappy earbuds, you'd be blown away.
So, appreciate it when you are with music. You're degrading the music as well as your surroundings when you walk around with an ipod.
meggi poo, you are delusional. Read this: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17777619/the_death_of_high_fidelity/2
and this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3
and this
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/327319_mp3sound13.html
Deligeez, you as well are hilariously delusional. Do some reading and stop believing what your itunes software tells you.
CD is comparable to vinyl in sound quality. An mp3 is what's called a lossy file. It works by deleting information in the WAV file you're not likely to notice. So, even when a file is ripped at 320kbps it is still only 10% of the original file. Read the above links
Wow. Do some reading people.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f46/can-i-hear-difference-between-320kbps-lossless-341289/
the CD is the source. How can anything other than the source sound better, i.e. your claimed 320 is better than 192. No kidding. CD is about 1141kbps