Isn't trying to prove religion with science like washing your feet with your sox on?

R

RayBalthazar

New member
Sep 20, 2011
22
0
1
What does science have to do with atheism?

What rocket scientist though that one up? Like me saying I bashed two rocks together in pond scum and failed to make life or dinosaurs so evolution and the beginning of life is false. Scientific proof of philosophy indeed.
 
No, it's worse. It is less effective and even more foolish.

People don't try to "prove" literature, art, or music with science. They only pull out the "evidence" trick on religion. They don't apply it to a multitude of other fields. This shows the skeptics bias. They insist on an non-applicable test for religion.
 
It's worse than that because you can wash feet while wearing socks
but real science isn't about proving things. Scientists try to disprove their hypotheses and theories then sees what sticks.

Atheism, like Science doesn't get bogged down with beliefs.
 
Science has to do with everything, it is after all the art of explaining the world around us - something that theism has failed miserably at.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
nine facts
2
Replies
23
Views
11K
eninn
E
H
I think it's one thing to have doubts on evolution, but it's a different thing to...
Replies
1
Views
383
Scooterpoop
S
E
Why do some Christians try to constantly prove that religion is more scientifically
Replies
0
Views
212
ethan
E
G
what is the point in religion?
Replies
0
Views
163
gboytiger
G
D
Is there science to support reincarnation, specifically that in the Buddhist
Replies
0
Views
204
dougs
D
Back
Top