why:
A: Pius Heinz went all-in with Ah Qh on a flopped board of Ks 10c 7c?
B: And why Martin Staszko called with 'just' a Q high flush draw?
To me, neither move made any sense, especially Staszko calling with just a draw.
(I get the idea of Pius bluffing in general but all-in with no hand and no real draw?)
(And why would Staszko call with just a Q high flush draw with so much at stake?)
Could someone explain to me what these guys might have been thinking cuz it STILL doesn't make any sense to me after they had played like 6 hours of extremely good and TIGHT headsup play for them both to go all-in in this particular hand?
Thanks!
A: Pius Heinz went all-in with Ah Qh on a flopped board of Ks 10c 7c?
B: And why Martin Staszko called with 'just' a Q high flush draw?
To me, neither move made any sense, especially Staszko calling with just a draw.
(I get the idea of Pius bluffing in general but all-in with no hand and no real draw?)
(And why would Staszko call with just a Q high flush draw with so much at stake?)
Could someone explain to me what these guys might have been thinking cuz it STILL doesn't make any sense to me after they had played like 6 hours of extremely good and TIGHT headsup play for them both to go all-in in this particular hand?
Thanks!