Dear Atheist how come you laugh at creationism when its proven ascientifically ?

J

JustinBeibe

New member
Sep 10, 2011
1
0
1
[edit] Nature

Adolf Zeising, whose main interests were mathematics and philosophy, found the golden ratio expressed in the arrangement of branches along the stems of plants and of veins in leaves. He extended his research to the skeletons of animals and the branchings of their veins and nerves, to the proportions of chemical compounds and the geometry of crystals, even to the use of proportion in artistic endeavors. In these phenomena he saw the golden ratio operating as a universal law.[49] In connection with his scheme for golden-ratio-based human body proportions, Zeising wrote in 1854 of a universal law "in which is contained the ground-principle of all formative striving for beauty and completeness in the realms of both nature and art, and which permeates, as a paramount spiritual ideal, all structures, forms and proportions, whether cosmic or individual, organic or inorganic, acoustic or optical; which finds its fullest realization, however, in the human form."[50]

In 2003, Volkmar Weiss and Harald Weiss analyzed psychometric data and theoretical considerations and concluded that the golden ratio underlies the clock cycle of brain waves.[51] In 2008 this was empirically confirmed by a group of neurobiologists.[52]

In 2010, the journal Science reported that the golden ratio is present at the atomic scale in the magnetic resonance of spins in cobalt niobate crystals.[53]

Several researchers have proposed connections between the golden ratio and human genome DNA.[54][55][56]
@Acid zebra
that is correct
 
Can't take you seriously knowing your avatar is a dogs back side.

Didn't read to know you're talking about crap. Evolution has been proven anyway.
 
The reason they do is because the simple fact that they believe that most creationist are just plain ignorant.
The reason they do this and try so many ways to disprove creationism is because they're arguing and trying to disprove the one and only almighty God.
Also they love to say that evolution can be proven through the flu virus which will "evolve" to where we have to make a new vaccine.
Saying this is ignorant yet true in its own way. The virus will simply adapt through adaptation, which is macro evolution, macro can be proven because it is simply nothing more than adaptation.
Micro evolution on the other hand is saying that basically we came from rock, that something non-living began to "evolve" and "Poof" it was alive after a few million years.

To Terminator: Please explain to me how "Micro" evolution can be proved.
 
Is this the same as a horse, dog, cat, pig and human embryo all look the same in the early stages?

Love you people who look for bland ideas to prove faith over science with nothing credible.
 
HahahAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahahahaha....

Stop this, my sides are aching now.
 
Why post a question, then paste a slab of text that doesn't even attempt to back it up?

Anyway... see reasons against below
 
@Terminator

Evolution proves nothing but the evolutionary process of humans, it doesn't prove origins. There is still no transitional fossils for humans and every thing that has been tried to be connect to humans such as the Piltdown man and Lucy have all been caught as frauds, grinding bones down and what not.

@Dogstar

I guess that's more of a step then some Atheists are taking, you can't prove anything, all you have is speculations and theorys, none of them are fact.

@Eskimo

LOLWIKIPEDIA ?
 
And everything else in the universe shows no relationship to the golden ratio. Do I need to explain meaningless coincidence to you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top