May 18, 2013 #1 V Vincent Member May 14, 2008 148 0 16 I have an idea, if a steam locomotive's boiler was heated by a metal heater instead of a fire, how much less maintance would be needed as it does not produce any ash or soot because it has no fire.
I have an idea, if a steam locomotive's boiler was heated by a metal heater instead of a fire, how much less maintance would be needed as it does not produce any ash or soot because it has no fire.
May 22, 2013 #2 J JEFFERSON New member Jun 19, 2008 26 0 1 No I think the fire and ash is the easy part. all the moving parts would require the maintenance.
May 23, 2013 #3 S Steve_in_SA New member Aug 9, 2010 3 0 1 And WHAT pray tell is going to heat your "metal heater"?