Feb 4, 2013 #1 X xlarsx New member Feb 4, 2013 0 0 0 Clive Bell claims that art is unrelated to significance in life. He believes that art transports us from everyday life and that art appreciation has nothing to do with life. How would Jerrold Levinson argue against Bell's position?
Clive Bell claims that art is unrelated to significance in life. He believes that art transports us from everyday life and that art appreciation has nothing to do with life. How would Jerrold Levinson argue against Bell's position?