Why is it so useless to argue with the pigs on the left?

M

Michelle'suglyface

New member
Sep 30, 2011
0
0
0
Liberals, please explain the point this hateful person was trying to make while arguing with Bristol Palin? Keep in mind that Obama and Sarah Palin have the same views about gay marriage.

fast forward to 2:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3yurAPdk8Y
 
you mean the bar fight thing? he was probably drunk, she might have been drinking, who knows. the point is, you don't get into bar fights- especially when you've got an image to protect.

I'm thinking it was staged. as soon as I found out it was for a reality show, the red flags went up.
(SHE got up in HIS face, and little was done about it. clearly they weren't worried.)
 
Like you said.. it is pointless to argue with a democrat... they have to wait to see what obama will tell them to think before they speak.
 
Read "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" by Al Franken.

It basically uncovers the naked truth about conservatives and their manipulation of facts.
 
I saw that video. A 50yo man calling a young girl a whore just because her mother was on the Repub ticket in 2008. Disgusting.
 
You’re actually quite wrong about Palin and Obama having the same views on anything.

Palin comes from a wholly different perspective on “the gays.” She’s one of the “pray the gays away” people. Which is pretty sick. She doesn’t believe in any gay rights.

Obama was for civil unions, but his opinion is evolving, according to him.

Palin doesn’t evolve.
 
Possibly because their answers are not based in logic. Liberals [extreme left] seem to be a victim of genetics. Hence a physical issue according to a study two liberal universities. So you can argue until doomsday and they will never see the logic because they cannot.
 
I guess pigs don't give in to those on the right who keep their mud hostage (and at such cost!). There could be cool pigs in our midst, instead, as our biggest problem.
 
It's your arguing skills, actually...

Name calling is a cognitive bias and a technique to promote propaganda. Propagandists use the name-calling technique to incite fears or arouse positive prejudices with the intent that invoked fear (based on fearmongering tactics) or trust will encourage those that read, see or hear propaganda to construct a negative opinion, in respect to the former, or a positive opinion, with respect to the latter, about a person, group, or set of beliefs or ideas that the propagandist would wish the recipients to believe. The method is intended to provoke conclusions and actions about a matter apart from an impartial examinations of the facts of the matter. When this tactic is used instead of an argument, name-calling is thus a substitute for rational, fact-based arguments against an idea or belief, based upon its own merits, and becomes an argumentum ad hominem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling
 
Bristol made no effort to avoid that fight, did she? You would think after three years, Bristol would have let it slide surely she's heard slurs against her mother very often.

You do realize that Bristol is plugging a new reality show? Could that have something to do with Bristol arguing with that guy - while a camera just "happened" to be there? The whole episode was every bit as bad as that "Balloon Boy" stunt a couple of years ago - Bristol was just looking for publicity - just like her mother.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Need answers to why we argue so much. Is this a major issue or something
Replies
0
Views
2K
ninaaaaa
N
A
The Warriors avoided back-to-back losses with a devastating 3rd quarter run
Replies
0
Views
114
admin
A
A
NBA Playoff Picture: The West is coming to order, but chaos still reigns out East
Replies
0
Views
178
admin
A
A
Wolves at the door: With Rubio dealing and KAT beasting, Minnesota's on a roll
Replies
0
Views
106
admin
A
A
LeBron turned back the clock to dominate, and the Pistons still beat the Cavs
Replies
0
Views
140
admin
A
Back
Top