Help with work cited?

tttpicklesttt

Member
Jan 24, 2008
74
0
6
Does this look right??Breslin, James E. From Modern to Contemporary: American Poetry 1945-1965. Chicago: University of Chicago P, 1983 and 1994.Stephenson, Gregory. The Daybreak Boys: Essays on the Literature of the Beat Generation. IL: Southern Illinois UP, 1990.Cook, Bruce. The Beat Generation. New York City: Scribner, 1971.“Introduction.” Contemporary Literature Criticism. Ed. Jeffrey W. Hunter, Deborah A. Stanley, Timothy J. White. 109 vols. London: Gale Research, 1999.“Principal Works.” Contemporary Literature Criticism. Ed. Jeffrey W. Hunter, Deborah A. Stanley, Timothy J. White. 109 vols. London: Gale Research, 1999.Rothschild, Matthew. “Interview August 1994.” Contemporary Literature Criticism. Ed. Jeffrey W. Hunter, Deborah A. Stanley, Timothy J. White. 109 vols. London: Gale Research, 1999.Reed, Brian. Schumacher, Michael. 2002. The Allen Ginsberg Trust. 7 February 2008. <www.allenginsberg.org>.Penguin City Lights. “Allen Ginsberg.” 2005. The Poetry Archive. 11 March 2008. < http://www.poetryarchive.org/poetryarchive/singlePoet.do?poetId=1547>.“Allen Ginsberg (1926-1997).” 2008. Poetry Foundation. 8 March 2008. < http://www.poetryfoundation.org/archive/poet.html?id=2547>.“On “Howl”.” Modern American Poetry. 8 March 2008. <http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/g_l/ginsberg/howl.htm>.“the beats: new york.” January 2008. Virginia Library Online. February 2008. <http://www.lib.virginia.edu/small/exhibits/sixties/beatsny.html>.Baz, Dreisinger. “‘Howl,’ Ginsberg’s Time Bomb, Still Setting Off New Explosions.” 2008. The New York Observer. February 2008. <http://www.observer.com/node/38651>.King, Lydia Hailman. “‘Howl’ obscenity prosecution still echoes 50 years later.” October 2007. First Amendment Center. February 2008. < http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=19132>.Slate, Michael. “A Song for Allen Ginsberg.” April 1997. Rwor. February 2008. < http://rwor.org/a/firstvol/900-905/903/gins.htm>.“03x0253s_l.1.gif” Photo Copy. Jstor.com 2000. 2008.Wait the second half got kinda messed up. Does the stuff on the first half look alright?
 
MLA?You don't need both copyrights only the newest one to the edition used. With the Contemporary Lit Criticism note the volumn used not the number of volumns. Also with the Contemporary Lit you need the inclusive pages for the article used. This will appear after the copyright date (say I used an article that occured between paged 210 and 214 then I would put 1999. 210-214). Don't abriviate Press and Univerity Press unless that is what your source did.
 
Back
Top