Marie Blayze

1. Do you believe that with a PPV every like, 3 weeks is taking away from the enjoyment of feuds?

2. With all these changes to PPV names and themes, which change was the worst?

3. Do you think an all HIAC PPV takes away from the enjoyment of having one HIAC match?

4. Would you rather see another championship scramble match themed PPV or the new all submission themed PPV?

5. Do you think it would be a good idea to retire the Diva’s belt and have a scramble match for the Women’s championship at one of the PPVs?

6. Do you think sooner or later the WWE will start shelling out lawsuits against live streams such as justin.tv and ustream?

7. If you were to name a PPV, what would it be called?

8. Have you ever attended a PPV [if so which one?]

9. Which PPV has been the best so far this year?

10. Which PPV has been the worst so far this year?

Alex

1: yes i do belive it is we should have ppvs like every 2 months.
2: the worst change was takin cyber sunday out of the ppv list!
3: yes it does
4: championship scramble!
5: ya good idea
6: yes i dont think wwe likes people seeing free ppvs
7: i would call it "there will be blood" all the matches would be extrme rules matches
8: no i have never attended one
9: id have to say no way out 2009
10: judgment day 2009 sucked

Miss Kristin

1. Absolutely yes.
2. The Bash. What's the point?
3. I think it would have been Ok if the WWE wasn't PG.
4. The scramble match was great, but you can put that anywhere and anytime. The submission based PPV sounds enjoyable.
5. No. Just unify the Divas and Women's championships.
6. Probably.
7. WWE Night of the Legends
8. Wrestlemania 17
9. The Bash was pretty good
10. Backlash

Miss Kristin

Ric F

1. no
2. cyber sundays was the worst
3. yes i do
4. another championship scramble themed ppv
5. no except for the womens championship scramble part good idea.
6. hopefully no
7. im already doing that check out wwx every monday my fantasy promotion
8. no i havent yet but im hoping to go to night of champions.
9. royal rumble
10 wrestlemania

word to the wise

sonny

1) Yes, because the feuds last forever. HHH-Orton is now 4 years.
2) Breaking Point. Not only is id dumb, the idea sucks as a whole.
3) Yes. Just like in TNA, the 6 Sides of Steel isnt that big anymore. Plus, what happens of the top breaks during tr he first match?
4) Yes. Scrambles are exciting. Submissions are so boring. I dont like it at all.
5) No. The Divas belt is a newer belt. You gotta give it a chance. Maybe in 2011. Not now.
6)Yes and no. The PPV Business is dying. Its not that good anymore.
7) Super Sunday. Idk. Lol
8) 2005 GAB in Buffalo.
9) WM 25 by far, 2 Royal Rumble.
10) Backlash. Breaking Point will be the worst at the end of 2009.

~Nick~ EYW Owner

1.Yea As Soon As One Is Complete They Automatically Focus On The Next One The Next Night On RAW.

2.Cyber Sunday To Annhilibation?What The He!! Is That.

3.Yes Hell In A Cell Is A Match Between Two To Six Guys That Hate Each Other Now I Believe Every Match Will Be Contested In A Hell In A Cell.Doesn't It Kinda Seem Their Trying To Compete With TNA.

4.Championship Scrabble Who Wants To See A PPV With Nothing But Submission Matches.I'm Not Buying That One.

5.No Combine Both To Be The Undisputed Womans Champion.

6.No I Don't Think They Care They Make Millions Even With Those Guys.

7.May Mayham

8.No But I Almost Went To Judgement Day 2002

9.Extreme Rules That Was A PPV That Was Unpredictable.

10.Judgement Day They Only Had One Good Match On The Card.