Thread: Which is more important to our current political leader: Style or substance?

It's not what you say, it's how you say it??

style. He is more interested in his image than he is of his reality.

Anarchy.

Substance - and compared to the last 8 years when the president had no style or substance, boy is it refreshing!

Barack has it all. Bush had no substance (he only listened to daddy) or style. You know it's true, if you don't you're in denial.

Substance, all we had for eight years prior to Obama was bushit.

When one has no substance, style is all that's left and that's all Obama is about. Though president he couldn't qualify to run a Burger King because that would require integrity.

When one has no substance, style is all that's left and that's all Obama is about. Though president he couldn't qualify to run a Burger King because that would require integrity.

Obama has the substance - he knows what's going on, and has good policies to get us going in the right direction.

He probably is used to speaking with policy specialists who with whom he is mutually intelligible.

However, it seems to be a strain on Obama to remove the nuance and depth when presenting the information to the American people.

The teleprompter helps him get the simplest part of his ideas across, keeping him from going into complex details that would confuse most Americans. This impinges on style.

I've listened and watched all speeches or tried too till I literally feel asleep and I'm not sure,, the style and substance are lacking for me, just my opinion.. but I say substance is important..