It seems to me that the CEOs actually contribute something worthwile to society (jobs, etc.), while the celebs contribute nothing and get all the glamour.
That's what I'd like to know. Why do morons generalize so much? Why do liberals see every CEO as dangerous and evil?
Saying "not true" doesn't make it any less true. Every time I see a liberal Democrat talking about CEO's, they're always seen as evil, always guilty of some malfeasance, even when the proof just isn't there. The full depth of any liberal plan regarding the economy is to blame the rich and raise their taxes. The rabid followers swallow it hook, line, and sinker, and that's not hate?
I'm sorry, actors contribute so much to society. Shows like "Friends" and "Sex and the City" are such important contributions to the fabric of our society.

BTW, corporate laws don't benefit "the few". They benefit anyone who is willing to work hard, and anyone who owns stock. There are no laws that the rich wield over us to keep us down.


My opinio