Would you want a 7 year Senator with a dismal Senate performance to be POTUS?

[Enigma]

You have to be talking about a democrat and I will just say that no democrats congressional performance would look real great after 20 years of a republican house and senate. Things are getting ready to change big time.

[GO HILLARY]

No--Fred Thompson served 9 years--it was John Edwards that served 7--Senator Clinton accomplished more then both in 6.

[Elway_the_Cat]

Nope, but I'm voting for a seven year senator who has a very good record in the Senate and has also served for seven years on the Senate Armed Forces Committee. I'm voting for a senator that gets high marks for her work in the Senate, even from those across the aisle from her. Why would I want one with a dismal performance when I've got Sen. Clinton to vote for instead?