Do you think that the BCS is backfiring on them? Following the BCS for the last 5 years and all I heard is strength of schedule and unbeaten need to be at the top. The only thing now I hear is that BC, CT, Arizona State do not belong that high. Isn't this the kettle calling the pot black?
You listen to ESPN analysists and they still say that the 1-2, even 3 loss teams should be ahead of the unbeaten few because of strength of schedule. There reasoning is because the so called powerhouses had poor games, injuries, and set backs; Isn't that football?
It will be interesting to see if the whole playoff debate becomes serious if one of these teams wins the national championship or plays in the game.
LSU, Beaten by a 6-3 Kentucky team.
Oregan lost to a 5-3 Cal team.
Oklahoma lost to 5-4 Colorado team.

USC lost to stanford, AT HOME 3-5.
Florida is 5-3 and is still ranked? Why don't we put ND in the top 25 based on telivision exposure.
College football is a joke now a days.