The analogy of a cliff is bogus.
You can prove the cliff exists while hell is a place that you have no evidence whatever for.
You may believe hell exists, but if you are completely honest, it is just a supposition. You believe it because someone told you it was real and you read it in a book.
You suspect you are right, and for that reason, Christians call everyone who doesn't believe ignorant fools.
It's not a matter of preventing an impending disaster, it's a matter of convincing someone else what you suspect may be an impending disaster, though you have absolutely no proof to offer them.
The engineers who were worried of the shuttle disaster with the faulty o-ring seals had data and even they were not believed. How do you expect people to believe you when you have NOTHING to offer?
I'm sorry, but your suppositions are not evidence, and without evidence, you have nothing to offer.
As far as warnings ... I doubt that you'll meet many people who haven't heard the tales before. Your concern is all you have to offer, and frankly, I've heard enough Christians telling me I'm wrong to last a couple lifetimes. From people here, to the woman sticking her finger at my chest saying I need Jesus, to Christians on patrol yapping at me while I'm trying to watch a fireworks show, to the screaming man on the Subway in Seoul, to the man standing on a box with a bull-horn in my town and on and on, I'm quite tired.
I KNOW what you believe. I was a Christian for a time myself. I've probably read the Bible more times than most people who've accosted me.
If Christians handled themselves better, people wouldn't get as upset.
If people want to know about my faith, all they need do is ask. I'm glad to discuss it with them. I even have a radio show ... and weird enough, I don't ask for, or receive a dime. The closest my religion comes to proselytizing is to admit who we are. If someone is interested, they will ask.
Being antagonistic is not a way to entice people to your point of view.
Bookmarks