Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Linked In Flickr Watch us on YouTube Google+
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Junior Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Is this a climate science skeptic rant?

    Well at least I learnt a new word (inspissate)

    oops sorry http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/24/monckton-of-meteorology-and-morality/

  2. #2
    Senior Member michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,105
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    NO= Global Warming ended in 2012 and the weather we're all getting now is like 1970's weather before Global Warming. Get used to it. Mike

  3. #3
    Member JohnCena's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    36
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    not in the least bit

  4. #4
    Senior Member Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,892
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Isn't that just typical of a climate alarmist ?Leaving out the evidence.

  5. #5
    Junior Member GaryF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    29
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    It's like a Classic Comics condensed version of a rant.

  6. #6
    Junior Member ClimateRealist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    No. It is not a climate science skeptic rant. It is a climate science denialist rant, full of ad homs.

    And if Monckton or anyone else wants to talk about morality, is it moral to risk human lives just so that we can continue to waste gas in SUVs and have accidents in our pants whenever the toilets back up in nuclear power plants?

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Any real scientist understands that CO2 warming ("Global Warming") was initially investigated to produce evidence against fossil fuels so that nuclear energy could be the "main" energy source of Great Britain.

    Climate scientists have only perpetuated the claim while real science continues to "not" understand everything. The ones who say they "do" know are only basking in their own husbandry!!!

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Wow! "Lord" Monckton sure knows how to stir the crowd, does he not? Did anyone take any notice as to how much science he used in his political speech? I would have felt like I was at political rally, if I had attended.

    Careful, Kano. I think that Joe may now believe you to be an alarmist, based on your question. ... Oh! Your question. Sorry. No, it is not a science skeptic's rant. I have never known Monckton to use any actual science in his discussions. He is a caught and branded liar. Ask The House of Lords about this. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Monckton,_3rd_Viscount_Monckton_of_Bre nchley - This is just Monckton being Monckton. A paid spokesman to say what ever you want to hear. He has made some very good money speaking to his choir.


Similar Threads

  1. The Inquisition of Climate Science
    By Geek in forum Science News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-09-2011, 12:23 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-12-2011, 08:37 AM
  3. An Important Victory for Climate Science
    By Geek in forum Science News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2011, 12:52 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-22-2008, 03:06 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-26-2007, 05:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.