No. It is not a climate science skeptic rant. It is a climate science denialist rant, full of ad homs.
And if Monckton or anyone else wants to talk about morality, is it moral to risk human lives just so that we can continue to waste gas in SUVs and have accidents in our pants whenever the toilets back up in nuclear power plants?
Any real scientist understands that CO2 warming ("Global Warming") was initially investigated to produce evidence against fossil fuels so that nuclear energy could be the "main" energy source of Great Britain.
Climate scientists have only perpetuated the claim while real science continues to "not" understand everything. The ones who say they "do" know are only basking in their own husbandry!!!
Wow! "Lord" Monckton sure knows how to stir the crowd, does he not? Did anyone take any notice as to how much science he used in his political speech? I would have felt like I was at political rally, if I had attended.
Careful, Kano. I think that Joe may now believe you to be an alarmist, based on your question. ... Oh! Your question. Sorry. No, it is not a science skeptic's rant. I have never known Monckton to use any actual science in his discussions. He is a caught and branded liar. Ask The House of Lords about this. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Monckton,_3rd_Viscount_Monckton_of_Brenchley - This is just Monckton being Monckton. A paid spokesman to say what ever you want to hear. He has made some very good money speaking to his choir.