experimentation? Because this is the prerequisite for something to be considered science. Until it does such it's a hypothesis at best. So, if it has not done so, then what testable predictions can it make that can be confirmed or falsified by experimentation?
Some here have demonstrated that they don't know what a scientific prediction is, so I'll get it out of the way here: a scientific prediction is what you do to give your model to explain a given phenomenon credence. For example, Louis de Broglie had a model for matter at the quantum scale, that it could be modeled as a transverse wave on the order of magnitude of the Planck constant. For this model he predicted that particles fired at a double slit would show a diffraction pattern similar to monochromatic light. This was tested and confirmed by G. P. Thomson in 1927, and a series of these experiments confirming this prediction confirmed de Broglie's model to be accurate.
So, now that we have that out of the way, has intelligent design contributed any of these testable predictions? Have any of them been confirmed? If not, what are some possible testable predictions that intelligent design could make?
@Yun: Did I say that there was for evolution or the big bang? Did I even say anything about evolution or the big bang in the question?
Bookmarks