OK, let's take your scenario further, shall we? You say why not cut taxes. Here's the thing: we're at war, we're in a recession, things are bad. When you cut taxes during a time like this, that means you have less money to spend in order to revitalize the job market. But hey, you're cutting taxes anyway, because businesses will hire more people if they have to pay less in taxes, right? Well, Obama's doing that. He's providing tax cuts to small businesses, which hire over 50% of the workforce. So who's he taxing? Large business owners. These large business owners hardly pay anything in taxes (they have the largest taxes levied at them, but there are so many loopholes that they come close to paying none). These companies are notorious for not increasing hiring after a tax decrease, mainly because they're pocketing the money. They don't have to grow their business, they just need to keep it running. And, hey, if they can keep it running with less employees, so much the better.
Taxation of these people isn't going to reduce jobs either. Many of these companies have already shed employees to the point at which any more would decimate their revenues. Beyond that, the tax increases that are being proposed are miniscule, a couple percentage points. Our rich would still pay far less in taxes than those of pretty much every other industrialized nation in the world.
Bookmarks