He was entitled to his opinion. Others may disagree.
|
|
He was entitled to his opinion. Others may disagree.
Morality as a bridle, hmm. It doesn't seem to be working because religious people are much more likely to be violent and unlawful than atheists.
The fact that John Adams can (and could today) hold that view even though atheists are in control of the united states is, in itself, proof that either
(a) people can be moral and non-religious; or,
(b) the statement is false.
You choose.
Is his opinion truth or something? No it isn't. He used slave labor so you shouldn't really hero worship him too much.
John Adams can suck a fat one, this is 2009
Well, atheists are moral, and he did say "only for a moral..."
So I don't know what your point is.
Moral AND religious. The two can coexist, you know.
You are a liar: http://www.liarsforjesus.com/
yeah everyone here has the right to complain!
it doesnt matter what you believe in, why are you scared atheist will rule after shutting your religion up?
what about freedon of speech?
screw you man!
Washington and Jefferson disagreed. INarguably much more important figures.
Bookmarks