...which is more effective and why? Im talking about in a street fight! I know its a bit like comparing apples to oranges because MMA has rules to abide by which make it less effective!
But just hypothetically speaking is the way of the intercepting fist more effective
or
The whole muay thai stand up then a take down get a dominant position and submit/pound more effective?
Discuss
Just a point to make - MMA was popular after Bruce Lees time do you think he would have changed his fencing stance and style to better accomidate BJJ/MMA or would he have rejected it as being ineffective on the street?
Another point is that not many MMA fighters use Bruce Lees stance or side kick because it is hard to defend against a take down / easier to get there back!
But just hypothetically speaking is the way of the intercepting fist more effective
or
The whole muay thai stand up then a take down get a dominant position and submit/pound more effective?
Discuss
Just a point to make - MMA was popular after Bruce Lees time do you think he would have changed his fencing stance and style to better accomidate BJJ/MMA or would he have rejected it as being ineffective on the street?
Another point is that not many MMA fighters use Bruce Lees stance or side kick because it is hard to defend against a take down / easier to get there back!