on tangents of their own? Is it simply a desire to use R&S to promote their personal views *OR* do most participants simply have atrocious reading comprehension skills (or both)?
================================================== =================
Some people will tend to reply with a demand for an example so here's one:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101213123913AA1SPOx
(Very few people even attempted to answer the question of why many Christians are prone to accept that the "interpretations of science" are flawed but not that their "personal interpretations of the Bible" are flawed -- and that those interpretation errors create the perceived disharmony between Science and the Bible.)
Bookmarks