Thread: Jehovah's Witnesses. According to Acts Chapter 15: 36 -41. Paul angrily argued...

...with Barnabas over the...? ....fellowship of Mark. And they parted ways, each with his own ministry, decisions and oppinion.

Did this made any of them "being in the wrong religion"? should we say paul was in the true worship because he wrote some scriptures and Barnabas in the wrong because he did not.

But if both were in the true religion, how true then is your ever so often preached belief - " There is only one true religion"?

And if the early Christian members of Christian Governing Body could disagree over issues which they found to be wrong and still be in the true religion, why then that your GB is threatening anyone who disagree with them with disfellowship an not likely to survive the armagedon. Even when they published and believes in such atrocities as - " Black people are a cursed and and a servant race ( The Golden Age, July24, 1929. page 702 ).? That African Skin colour must be changed for resurection into the new system to be possible - ( Watchtower febuary 15, 1904. p.52-53) And the White skin colour was the colour God saw and declared "very good" (Watchtower April 1, 1914. p. 10).?

I would suggest you actually READ those articles instead of quoting one sentence from them. They actually don't say that- it's out of context.

Anyway, Paul and Barnabas figured their little dealio out and served together again as servants of Jehovah.

The Governing Body isn't threatening anyone who disagrees with us. However, if you don't agree with the Bible, that's another story.

@Trueness
You totally made that up. I'm looking at that book right now. It doesn't even show Jehovah. It shows Jesus who is white in the AMERICAN version. He is bowing down and has white hair here. Oftentimes, the Governing Body will change the color of people's skin depending on where the literature is produced. In Africa, this book could possibly show a black Jesus. Who cares what color of skin Jesus has?