why do lesbians aren't mentioned in the Bible?

[SINNERGIRL]

the Bible mentions always men with men and feminine men?
and romans it's just speaking about women with women?
"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:" -Romans 1:26

NATURE? WHAT IS NATURE according to PAUL? even Paul wasn't married so he didn't know a real woman then

[chicken]

It does mention it.

Take a look at Romans 1:26-27

[BlackTempest]

the bible is sexist

[Abba]

The original language mentions homosexual behavior in the context which has been translated in to men theses days.

In case you are unaware lesbians are homosexual.

[BlackTempest]

the bible is sexist

[AtheistBassist]

too hot.

[SugarPuffttt]

Men and men together are wrong..an abomination, woman and woman?think for yourself, read the bible then you will know.If you read properly you will see that God believes two females together are unnatural, God MADE ADAM AND EVE AND NOT ADAM AND STEVE NEITHER DID HE CREATE 2 EVE'S..

[Zen]

coz no one complains about 2 women

[SteveB]

Romans 1:26-27

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural USE OF THE WOMAN, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.

The whole passage is referring to sex

[Lucifer]

because the bible was written by a man...a man who was old, sexist, and completely fucked up from all the Shrooms and LSD he was taking. of course it wasnt called that whenever it was written but he was on something and somehow wrote a whole lot of crap about an imaginary man who impregnated a woman without having sex with her