Okay, i saw this last night on the new "it's me or the dog." I'm a fan of positive/reward based training and i love most of her methods. I especially liked how she worked on the balcony (when the dog showed to be too reactive at the edge she moved him back until she could get solid "watch mes" without him reacting.)
But there is one thing that bothers me. When Victoria was working with the Boxer (Cooper?) in the yards, he was clearly targeting the other dogs on the walks. Yet she still gave him treats. Why would someone reward that behavior? Sure it stops him from lunging and true he's sitting/staying and occasionally looking at her, but he's still targeting the dogs and can easily revert to the aggression that is the main problem.
Wouldn't it be better in this situation to remove him or correct him in some way for the targeting behavior then get his focus back on you? When used correctly, couldn't correction break the targeting habit without making him fearful of other dogs? I personally don't believe that correction will remove the "warning" behavior and make him move right to the bite as this behavior is NOT a warning but a predatory gaze....
That's always been my main problem with reward based training with no corrections - trainers would reward a behavior like a sit/stay but the dog can still show the aggressive behavior like the targeting, ruffled fur, etc. How does that stop or cure aggression (other than keeping the dog under control?)
FYI i consider "correction" to be anything from removing the dog from the situation to light leash pops.
Bookmarks