Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Linked In Flickr Watch us on YouTube Google+
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Junior Member PeterTaylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    0
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    How is the civil union (i.e. gay marriage) treated in the UK rules of succession?

    I was wondering that since UK is amongst the first countries that accepted gay marriage, if that applies also to their royal family. Let's say that one member in line to the throne comes out and marries his or her partner. Does he/she lose his/her place to the succession line? Does the partner has the same rights and titles as any other royal consort?

    Just for example, say that HRH The Prince Alexander (a fictional son of Queen Elizabeth II, born after Prince Edward), was openly gay and was to marry his long-time lover Mr. James Tudor. Then:

    a) Legally, he would keep his place to the succession line (i.e. 10th)?

    b) What would be the proper title and style of Mr. Tudor? To stretch it even more, what would Mr. Tudor called in the occasion that the fictional Prince Alexander becomes King Alexander IV of the UK? Would Alexander have the right to grand to his partner a "Prince Consort" status, or given him a title, in the same manner the current Queen names her children Dukes on their wedding day?
    Paco your answer implies that Alexander would be treated as unmarried in the succession rules after his civil union and Mr. Tudor would be nobody for the royal family.


    What about the first part of the question, would he still be in the succession line?
    BSRT serious answers only, please...

  2. #2
    Junior Member LordPercyWooster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    there are no laws to remove homosexuals from secession

    no it is a civil union not a marriage, there are no rights accrued by a spouse everything is derived through the blood secession, titles and everything else is at the discretion of monarch

  3. #3
    Junior Member TYTONIDAE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    They ,who ever,would NOT be married in the eyes of the Church,therefore would NOT be eligible to ascend the Throne.
    Gays go through a civil partnership ceremony,NOT a marriage,lets get that straight,excuse the pun !

  4. #4
    Junior Member BSRT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Both of them will be styled and called Their Majesties the Queers.

  5. #5
    Member Paco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    76
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Civil rules have no effect on laws governing royals or peerages. Similarly in the UK you can be "legitimated by marriage" or if you are born to parents who get married after your birth, then you are legitimate. However, with regard to the line of succession you are forever banned.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2011, 09:04 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2011, 09:04 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2011, 09:04 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-15-2008, 09:32 PM
  5. Gay marriage versus Civil union issue. ?
    By plan_ner in forum The Closet
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-17-2008, 02:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.