Shouldn't GM, Ford and Chrysler all merge to form a leaner, meaner single

StephenL

Member
Jun 13, 2008
55
0
6
U.S. auto company? Most of Congress has decided that bailing them out is not worthwhile because it won't work anyway and they'll just need more money in a matter of months. I agree with this. Some in Congress point out that a car company cannot survive in bankruptcy because need for parts and service are on-going and who the heck is going to buy a car from a bankrupt company (unless the car is sold well undervalue)? I think that's also correct. So here's what I think is the only real solution: All 3 should merge and form one company which, of course, will mean lay-offs, but not nearly as bad as the alternative. This single company would still be competing against foreign auto makers, so there are no worries about a monopoly.

Does anyone else agree with me? If not, what do you see as the alternative? Remember -- letting these companies go out of business means 2 - 3 million workers losing their jobs.
Please offer the alternative to what I'm suggesting and why yours is a good idea.
Dewey, I agree, but in the meantime these 3 auto makers are on the verge of going out of business. The CEOs of GM and Ford told Congress their companies would be out of business within a year unless they received a bail-out -- which they didn't receive. Don't even get me started about their corporate jets -- what a disgrace!
 
Back
Top