In defence of bad spelling

Photographer

New member
Mar 22, 2008
28
0
1
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
 
Seems many folks on here are aware of that fact because we see it all the time.

Maybe not as much as you did though...
 
Funny enough, if you scan your eyes across it quickly, the brain does seem to take it in surprisingly well. I find I can read that almost as fast as I can read properly spelled text.
 
Jesus I'm slow...

I was sitting for about 2 seconds there thinking that that message looked funny, DUH!
Someone shoot me

Hey I bet it was annoying writing that out
 
Back
Top